The AI model showdown

AI Model Leaderboard

Which AI model actually performs best? Not marketing claims. Not synthetic benchmarks. Every text and image generated on OneAIWorld is scored by an independent AI reviewer — these are the live results.

Start free Run your own comparison

Top text models right now

  1. Gemma 4 26B MoE 8.78/10 Strongest at Creativity
  2. Gemma 4 31B 8.72/10 Strongest at Creativity
  3. Claude Haiku 4.5 8.49/10 Strongest at Accuracy
Head to head

The top two, dimension by dimension

How the current number one and number two text models compare on every review dimension.

#1 · Leader Gemma 4 26B MoE 8.78 3 of 5 dimensions won
#2 · Challenger Gemma 4 31B 8.72 1 of 5 dimensions won
  • 8.23 Accuracy 8.15
  • 9.31 Relevance 9.31
  • 9.49 Coherence 9.25
  • 7.34 Creativity 7.31
  • 9.22 Language Quality 9.26

1 tied. Bars start at 5 out of 10 so small gaps stay visible; the numbers are the exact averages.

Gemma 4 26B MoE Top overall · 8.78/10
GPT OSS 120B Fastest · 8.4s avg
Gemma 4 26B MoE Most creative · 7.34/10
23 models 193 reviewed generations

Last 90 days of generations. Text models need 5+ and image models 3+ reviewed generations to be ranked — small samples can't distort the board.

Full rankings

Every model, every score

Text models

Scored 0–10 on accuracy, relevance, coherence, creativity, and language quality, plus the reviewer's overall rating — that's the ranking. Strongest at shows where each model beats the field average, so you can pick a model for your kind of task.

Model Overall AccuracyRelevanceCoherenceCreativityLanguage Quality Avg speed Strongest at
1 Gemma 4 26B MoE14 reviews 8.78 8.239.319.497.349.22 41.4s Creativity
2 Gemma 4 31B12 reviews 8.72 8.159.319.257.319.26 51.6s Creativity
3 Claude Haiku 4.512 reviews 8.49 8.069.319.176.658.93 18.9s Accuracy
4 Claude Opus 4.68 reviews 8.41 7.868.819.296.619.18 46.4s Coherence
5 DeepSeek R112 reviews 8.41 7.818.989.06.819.1 24.3s Creativity
6 GPT-4.1 Mini10 reviews 8.26 7.939.219.025.888.93 9.5s Accuracy
7 GPT-5.49 reviews 8.25 7.739.099.036.098.99 9.8s Coherence
8 Llama 4 Scout14 reviews 8.0 7.528.958.715.778.72 13.0s Relevance
9 deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-R1-05286 reviews 7.97 7.48.988.596.158.43 33.6s Relevance
10 Qwen/Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-25076 reviews 7.94 7.238.818.925.818.6 15.6s Coherence
11 Qwen/Qwen2.5-72B-Instruct7 reviews 7.94 7.599.028.635.558.57 19.3s Relevance
12 deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V38 reviews 7.94 7.488.948.545.988.43 24.8s Relevance
13 Mistral Medium8 reviews 7.94 7.238.698.795.988.68 36.6s Coherence
14 Grok 4.1 Fast9 reviews 7.81 7.178.647.926.658.32 15.9s Creativity
15 Phi-49 reviews 7.76 7.298.318.595.658.65 30.0s Language Quality
16 openai/gpt-4o-mini12 reviews 7.76 7.238.648.595.238.76 8.7s Language Quality
17 zai-org/GLM-4.66 reviews 7.51 6.568.148.255.818.43 20.5s Creativity
18 meta-llama/Llama-4-Scout-17B-16E-Instruct5 reviews 7.5 6.938.318.324.988.63 14.2s Language Quality
19 GPT OSS 120B9 reviews 7.5 6.848.317.815.768.43 8.4s fastest Creativity
20 openai/gpt-oss-120b5 reviews 7.38 6.937.918.324.988.43 27.6s Language Quality

Image models

Scored 0–10 on accuracy, relevance, coherence, creativity, and image quality, plus the reviewer's overall rating. Image models rank with 3+ reviewed generations — image volume runs lower than text, and the sample size is shown per row.

Model Overall AccuracyRelevanceCoherenceCreativityImage Quality Avg speed Strongest at
1 GPT Image 1 Mini5 reviews 8.76 8.429.89.526.918.95 31.7s Accuracy
2 FLUX.1 Dev4 reviews 8.65 8.219.539.576.798.77 11.0s Accuracy
3 Gemini 3.1 Flash Image3 reviews 8.54 7.959.419.656.728.69 10.1s Coherence
Reliability

Quality only matters if the answer arrives

Success rate of generation jobs by AI platform on our infrastructure.

PlatformJobsSuccess rate
OpenAI 12 91.7%
Black Forest Labs 6 83.3%
Google 6 83.3%
Methodology

How the leaderboard works

  1. Real generations

    Users run real prompts through real models — no synthetic test sets, no cherry-picking.

  2. Independent review

    Every output is scored 0–10 by an independent AI evaluator on five quality dimensions plus an overall rating.

  3. Aggregated per model

    Scores, latency, and success rates are averaged per model. Text models need 5+ reviews to rank, image models 3+.

  4. Always current

    Rankings shift with every new generation — this is live real-world output, not a one-time benchmark run.

Privacy: only aggregate statistics are ever published — never user prompts, and never generated content.

Strongest at compares each model against the field average, so it highlights genuine standout ability rather than dimensions every model aces. For deeper matchup analysis, read our AI model comparisons and guides.

Last updated November 4, 2026.

Which model wins for your prompt?

Type it once — see every model's answer side by side, scored.

Compare text models Compare image models